Comments on: What The Papers Say http://completegeek.nfshost.com/2006/11/08/what-the-papers-say/ Of science and the human heart Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:49:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3 by: Carole http://completegeek.nfshost.com/2006/11/08/what-the-papers-say/#comment-38 Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:12:43 +0000 http://completegeek.nfshost.com/2006/11/08/what-the-papers-say/#comment-38 Hay, It was really interesting to read your views on evolution Vs creationism. It's great that you have pionted out that they are both theories. I agree with you that they can't be proved by science. At school I've always been tought that evolution was a fact even though the teachers always told us it was a theory as well. They sort of contridicted them selves. Kepp wrting about really interesting debates in the world!!!! I agree with you because I also believe in creationism dispite what the evolutionists say!!! Hay, It was really interesting to read your views on evolution Vs creationism. It’s great that you have pionted out that they are both theories. I agree with you that they can’t be proved by science.

At school I’ve always been tought that evolution was a fact even though the teachers always told us it was a theory as well. They sort of contridicted them selves.

Kepp wrting about really interesting debates in the world!!!!

I agree with you because I also believe in creationism dispite what the evolutionists say!!!

]]> by: Jeremy http://completegeek.nfshost.com/2006/11/08/what-the-papers-say/#comment-37 Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:24:50 +0000 http://completegeek.nfshost.com/2006/11/08/what-the-papers-say/#comment-37 Fantastic Racs - really enjoyed your post (now that I have your password!!). I love the way you see the straw men being pushed toward you. The whole article from the paper is a terrific example of people manufacturing beliefs in line with their own strongly held tenets from information presented to them. Both Creationism and Darwinian evolution are theories (see communist schools teaching) and both require faith. For anything to be proven scientifically it must be repeatable which of course the beginning of time is not. So extrapolation from devolution/natural selection is not scientific proof but conjecture. I think Alistair Campbell, Blair's late spin doctor, could take lessons from the article's author on how to reframe information to meet the needs of his belief system. Thanks again - I will read more often. Keep thinking - that is what God made us for. TvBF Fantastic Racs - really enjoyed your post (now that I have your password!!). I love the way you see the straw men being pushed toward you. The whole article from the paper is a terrific example of people manufacturing beliefs in line with their own strongly held tenets from information presented to them. Both Creationism and Darwinian evolution are theories (see communist schools teaching) and both require faith. For anything to be proven scientifically it must be repeatable which of course the beginning of time is not. So extrapolation from devolution/natural selection is not scientific proof but conjecture. I think Alistair Campbell, Blair’s late spin doctor, could take lessons from the article’s author on how to reframe information to meet the needs of his belief system.

Thanks again - I will read more often. Keep thinking - that is what God made us for. TvBF

]]>